By Sybil Drew / August 24th, 2024

The scientific consensus on climate change is clear: human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are driving global temperatures to unprecedented levels. This warming is causing a range of adverse effects, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation patterns. The consequences of climate change are already being felt around the world, with disproportionate impacts on vulnerable populations and ecosystems.

Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence, climate change remains a highly politicized issue. In many countries, there is a sharp divide between those who acknowledge the reality and urgency of climate change and those who remain skeptical or dismissive. This polarization is often fueled by ideological differences, economic interests, and misinformation campaigns.

“The public is largely accepting of climate science and wants government to act on it. There are very few ‘deniers’. This is true even in countries like the US, where climate change is highly politicized.” Says Sam Crawley, professor and researcher at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, “However, people tend to be more worried about other issues such as the economy and healthcare, partly because people find climate change so large and complex and are not sure what can be done about it. There is therefore a lack of strong public pressure on politicians to take action on climate change, and politicians would therefore prefer to avoid climate change as an issue, since it is so challenging to deal with.” 

“There are many other factors as well, some of the richest corporations in the world are built on fossil fuel extraction and production, and it’s in the interests of their shareholders to block or slow down government efforts to curb emissions as much as possible.” Says Crawley, “Given the resources those industries have at their disposal, these efforts have succeeded in at least politicizing climate change, if not substantially slowing or blocking progress on climate action.”

The transition to a low-carbon economy presents significant economic challenges and opportunities as well, which can stifle talk. While some industries, such as fossil fuels, face the prospect of decline, the shift towards renewable energy sources can create new jobs and economic growth to those who embrace it. However, the economic costs of inaction on climate change are expected to be far greater, including damage to infrastructure, agricultural losses, and increased healthcare costs.

While governments and businesses bear much of the responsibility for addressing climate change, individuals can also make a significant contribution. Reducing energy consumption, choosing sustainable transportation options, and supporting policies that promote renewable energy are just a few examples of actions that individuals can take to help mitigate climate change.

Climate politics is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a multifaceted approach. By understanding the scientific evidence, the economic implications, and the political landscape, individuals can become informed and engaged citizens, working towards a sustainable future for all.